Skip to content

Conversation

@lmktfy
Copy link
Member

@lmktfy lmktfy commented Nov 20, 2025

  • move HPA into workload autoscaling section

preview

Helps with issue #4493

/sig autoscaling
/language en
/label refactor

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/autoscaling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Autoscaling. language/en Issues or PRs related to English language refactor Indicates a PR with large refactoring changes e.g. removes files or moves content labels Nov 20, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign sayakmukhopadhyay for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the sig/docs Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Docs. label Nov 20, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Nov 20, 2025
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These changes ensure that existing bookmarks etc will continue to work.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 20, 2025

Pull request preview available for checking

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 21819bb
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/kubernetes-io-main-staging/deploys/6925ea8c37597d0008522a9f
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-53353--kubernetes-io-main-staging.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@lmktfy
Copy link
Member Author

lmktfy commented Nov 20, 2025

/retitle Reorganize autoscaling docs

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot changed the title Revise autoscaling docs Reorganize autoscaling docs Nov 20, 2025
Copy link
Member

@omerap12 omerap12 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
from sig-autoscaling

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: ad6549d334bda9aa25306cab7e8774feaace4496

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 21, 2025
@omerap12
Copy link
Member

By the way, would it make sense to update the list of HPA reviewers as well?
(https://github.com/kubernetes/website/pull/53353/files#diff-23b5ad9815a2c4d17fd5d4ef076a9a5ac76fc5dc7c55d77848c70143111180acL3-L5)

I’d recommend adding the currently active HPA reviewers - such as @adrianmoisey and myself:
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/pkg/controller/podautoscaler/OWNERS#L3

@lmktfy lmktfy force-pushed the 20251120_update_workload_autoscaling_docs branch from 8245260 to 3203231 Compare November 23, 2025 13:47
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 23, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 23, 2025
@lmktfy
Copy link
Member Author

lmktfy commented Nov 23, 2025

By the way, would it make sense to update the list of HPA reviewers as well? (https://github.com/kubernetes/website/pull/53353/files#diff-23b5ad9815a2c4d17fd5d4ef076a9a5ac76fc5dc7c55d77848c70143111180acL3-L5)

It would - ideally in a separate PR.

@lmktfy
Copy link
Member Author

lmktfy commented Nov 23, 2025

Also see kubernetes/autoscaler#8839

@omerap12
Copy link
Member

By the way, would it make sense to update the list of HPA reviewers as well? (https://github.com/kubernetes/website/pull/53353/files#diff-23b5ad9815a2c4d17fd5d4ef076a9a5ac76fc5dc7c55d77848c70143111180acL3-L5)

It would - ideally in a separate PR.

Done in #53364

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 24, 2025
Move the HPA page to be a concept page alongside VPA.
@lmktfy lmktfy force-pushed the 20251120_update_workload_autoscaling_docs branch from 3203231 to 21819bb Compare November 25, 2025 17:42
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 25, 2025
Comment on lines -69 to -78
At the moment, the VPA can operate in four different modes:

{{< table caption="Different modes of the VPA" >}}
Mode | Description
:----|:-----------
`Auto` | Currently `Recreate`. This might change to in-place updates in the future.
`Recreate` | The VPA assigns resource requests on pod creation as well as updates them on existing pods by evicting them when the requested resources differ significantly from the new recommendation
`Initial` | The VPA only assigns resource requests on pod creation and never changes them later.
`Off` | The VPA does not automatically change the resource requirements of the pods. The recommendations are calculated and can be inspected in the VPA object.
{{< /table >}}
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Now documented in the VPA concept page.

Copy link
Member

@omerap12 omerap12 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
from sig-autoscaling

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 25, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: a8c5fcebc5fd527ea348055d338d63a05026a5be

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. language/en Issues or PRs related to English language lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. refactor Indicates a PR with large refactoring changes e.g. removes files or moves content sig/autoscaling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Autoscaling. sig/docs Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Docs. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants